top of page

Potential Pre-1846 Artifacts

These entries are primarily here to assist archaeologists in British Columbia to identify historic artifacts that could pre-date 1846. Why 1846, you ask? Because the BC Heritage Conservation Act as of April 2023 states that any archaeological site that pre-dates 1846 is protected by the law - if after that date, you have to get it designated as a heritage resource to have it protected. It is my belief that the majority of archaeologists in BC have trouble identifying the age of historic artifacts. This Pre-1846 page is for them. A note: most of the historical and artifact information placed here is about the English, because I read english - I don't read Spanish or Russian. However, there is the possibility of finding Russian, Spanish, or even Asian artifacts from before 1846.

VERY BRIEF HISTORY OF FIRST CONTACT WITH EUROPEANS AND THEIR GOODS:

Before 1846, European goods were already in demand and being provided to the First Nations of British Columbia. Before actual contact between the people of these cultures, goods would have been traded by Europeans to eastern First Nations groups and would make their way through trade routes from east to west. The fur trade began in earnest in eastern Canada in the early 1600s. Given a generous 100 years for demand in European goods to move across the country, it is safe to suggest that early European goods would have been known to Aboriginal peoples in British Columbia by the early 1700s. The first official record of explorers reaching the BC coast was in 1774 when a Spanish expedition caught sight of Haida Gwaii. By the 1790s, British explorers were, expectedly, reporting the use of European goods by the First Nations in British Columbia. From the east, the first recorded exploration to reach the British Columbia Coast was by Alexander Mackenzie's famous trip across the land in 1793 - ending just off Bella Coola at "Mackenzie's Rock". By the time Simon Fraser reached the slow, lower mainland portions of his namesake river 15 years later in 1808, he found the First Nations near the coast were already well supplied with European goods (Ormsby 1959:38).  Individual European expeditions to BC would have left little evidence on the land, but they left sometimes detailed diaries that provide important information about how and when trade goods moved across the country.

 

The first maritime fur traders to the BC coast would have been the Russians. They were in Alaska by the 1740s and would have ventured further south for more otter pelts as resources became depleted in Alaska. Russian artifacts are possible on the BC Coast from ca. 1800 on - possibly earlier. The Russian Activity in Alaska and on the northwest coast is what prompted first the Spanish and British explorers and then the British and American fur traders into the are. Contact became more common as more Europeans came to BC and discovered the natural resources like lumber and coal that were available there.

LATER HISTORIC SITES MAKE US THINK THAT HISTORIC ARTIFACTS COME IN LARGE NUMBERS. BUT EARLY SITES WOULD HAVE THEM IN SMALL NUMBERS AND ANY MIXING OF EUROPEAN AND FIRST NATIONS ARTIFACTS (OR THE PRESENCE OF THE TYPES OF ARTIFACTS BELOW) IN THE GROUND OR ON THE SURFACE HAS TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY AS A POSSIBLE PRE-1846 SITE.

bottom of page